trichview.support
Re: TRichView vs. WpTools |
Author |
Message |
Torsten |
Posted: 02/21/2002 6:16:19 Hi Sergey, could you move up the 'left/right alignment of images' to the second place ? You need this for html-import anyway. And since most users can use MS Word, office-converters or IE for converting to rtf, the html-import is not such a critical issue ( at least IMHO ). Torsten "Sergey Tkachenko" <[email protected]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[email protected]... > My current work priorities: > - bullets/numbering (multilevel, with many options) > - html import (probably without CSS at the first stage) > - live spelling > - drag and drop > - improvements in formatting (tabs, left/right alignment of images) > - WYSIWYG > and some simple tasks like headers/footers or image resizing as a background > work. > So WYSIWYG will be implemented not very soon. > I am trying not to hurry with new features but implementing them in the best > possible way. > > RV and WPT have slightly different "patterns". > WPTools is more like MS Word. > RichView is more like IE/visual html editors. > This difference can be clearly seen comparing tables in WPT and RV. > > > Looking at this iste and at the demos I see that the main features wpTools > > has and TRichEdit lacks are WYSIWYG page layout mode, headers and footers, > > background spellchecking a la Word and columns. In truth I have never used > > colums, as they have never been requested, and can live without background > > spell checking though it would be nice and not to difficoult to implement. > > But may clients certainly equire page layout mode (with active rulers) and > > headers and footers. Do you have any plans for these features? > > > > > > |
Powered by ABC Amber Outlook Express Converter