Re: Problems with Richview

Author

Message

Jean-Luc

Posted: 02/25/2003 16:51:58

Dear Sergey,

1000 times thank you.

for your rapid answer an your good news.

I am convinced that richview is a good solution, I'll try to

convince my directors to use it even if some liars try to

make as if they knew more than others telling just no matter what.

I will do some testing with the trial version then I'm 99% sure that i will

very soon purchase the registered version from you.

(If you also could tell me about where I could find some MS Word like Vertical/horizontal

rulers for richview it would also be very kind of you, I also sent a message

to the responsibles for Addict V3 spell checkers add-on and I've no answer

concerning the following question: When compiling addict spell checker with

richview, do the end-users (not the programmers) have any licence to pay

? Have you an idea ?)

Again many thanks.

read you soon. ;-)

Jean-Luc

"Sergey Tkachenko" <[email protected]> wrote:

>What's wrong with each cell having its own document?

>There is only one inconvenience here - items in cells do not belong to the

>main document, so if you need to iterate through all items in the document,

>you need to write a simple recursive procedure.

>One of the main special features of RV architecture is a concept "document

>is a collection of items" instead of buffer of characters with accompanying

>attributes. Some task are solved more convenient in this architecture, some

>may be not.

>But all above is a matter of convenience.

>As for efficiency - you can test it by loading large documents.

>> Hello,

>> Someone told me that each cell in a richview table contained

>> a richview document. this people told me that the intern architecture

>> the code was a real pitty. Does anyone knows about this , can this

>implementation

>> lead to problems ?

>> (memory management, performance ...)

>> Many thanks.

>> Jean-Luc