TRichViewEdit Hovering Problem
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2020 8:13 pm
Hi. First, sorry for my english.
The question is: When i use jump and enable hovering with 1 sentence in multi lines, say it 2 lines, why richviewedit only hover the line that have cursor on it? Example:
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's
standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make
a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining
essentially unchanged.
When i put my cursor on "It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining
essentially unchanged." why it only hover "It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining"?
And when i move to "essentially unchanged", the rest are not hovered. They have same jump ID, same sentence, but the hover mark seems cannot mark multiline. How to solve this?
The question is: When i use jump and enable hovering with 1 sentence in multi lines, say it 2 lines, why richviewedit only hover the line that have cursor on it? Example:
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's
standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make
a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining
essentially unchanged.
When i put my cursor on "It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining
essentially unchanged." why it only hover "It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining"?
And when i move to "essentially unchanged", the rest are not hovered. They have same jump ID, same sentence, but the hover mark seems cannot mark multiline. How to solve this?